TL;DR: Key mistakes to avoid when framing qualitative research questions

• Avoid leading, assumptive, or emotionally charged questions—they bias responses.
• Don’t ask double-barreled, hypothetical, or Yes/No questions when depth is needed.
• Use neutral language and skip jargon to keep things clear and honest.
• Hold back your own opinions to avoid shaping participant feedback.

‍

In qualitative research, asking the right questions is everything.

When your questions are biased, vague, or poorly framed, they don’t just confuse participants. They cloud your insights. You walk away thinking you’ve found an answer, but what you actually have is a reflection of your question design, not your participant’s experience.

And in India’s complex, multilingual, multi-demographic market, the margin for error is even smaller. Missteps in framing questions can distort insights across age, region, or language—leading to flawed product decisions or marketing assumptions. Don’t just take our word for it. Nielsen Norman also talks about how poorly framed questions can distort user responses and lead to inaccurate conclusions.

Let's explore some key types of questions to avoid during your user research interviews to keep things as unbiased as possible.

1. Leading questions

These are the classic “pushy” questions that guide participants toward a particular answer.

Example to avoid: "Don’t you agree that this new app interface is much better?"
This nudges the participant toward a “yes,” whether they mean it or not.

Reframe it: "What are your thoughts on the new app interface?"
→ This opens the door for honest, unfiltered opinions that the researcher is looking for.

🛠 Pro tip for Indian researchers: In multilingual studies, leading questions are especially risky when translated. Always back-translate your discussion guide and test it with bilingual speakers.

Understanding the difference between observation and insight can also help you frame better research questions.

‍

2. Double-Barreled questions

These questions are like two-in-one deals, but they're more confusing than convenient. 

Example to avoid: "Did you find the checkout smooth and the payment options convenient?" 

Sometimes they just say "yes" to both questions, making the question even more confusing! 

Reframe it. Break it into two:

• “How was your experience with the checkout flow?”
• “What did you think of the payment options?”

This way, participants can express their thoughts more clearly.

Additionally, to capture even deeper, more nuanced feedback, you could consider using the diary method. This way, participants can record their experiences over time, providing richer insights into both navigation flow and visual impressions as they naturally interact with the site.

‍

3. Loaded questions

These pack an emotional punch, using strong language that can affect responses and can cause participants to overreact or feel cornered.

Example to avoid: "How frustrated were you when using the payment gateway?" 

This assumes the participant had a frustrating experience. This kind of wording not only introduces bias but can also confuse someone who didn’t feel frustrated at all. They might pause to wonder if they missed something.

Reframe it: "What challenges, if any, did you face during checkout?"

→ Keeps tone neutral while still inviting feedback.

4. Hypothetical questions

Avoid asking participants to predict the future. Speculating about the future rarely yields usable insights. Instead, focus on their past experiences or current perceptions.

Example: "Would you buy this skincare product if it was available in a 50ml tube?"

Reframe it: "Have you bought skincare products in that format before? Why or why not?"

📊 Grounding questions in real past behavior is especially effective in Indian markets where aspirational responses can skew actual preferences.

‍

5. Binary (Yes/No) questions

These questions can be too limiting. Avoid them when you need detailed responses. Instead, opt for open-ended questions that allow participants to share their thoughts more freely.

Example to avoid: "Do you use our app regularly?"

Reframe it: "Can you walk me through the last time you used our app?"
→ Helps uncover context, habits, and motivations.

6. Assumptive questions

The types of questions assume knowledge, preferences, or behaviors that may not exist. 

Example to avoid: “As a frequent flyer, do you use online check-in?”

Here, you’re assuming the participant is a frequent flyer. 

Reframe it:
“How often do you travel by air?”
OR
“When you fly, how do you typically check in?”

Never assume what your participants know or prefer. Always let participants establish their context first.

💡This is especially important when working with India’s diverse audiences. Assumptions can alienate or confuse participants unfamiliar with certain lifestyle references.

‍

7. Social desirability bias

Be aware that participants may give answers they think are socially acceptable. Participants may answer in ways that make them look good rather than being honest. Instead, ask about their actual habits and experiences to minimize bias.

Example to avoid: “Do you always use eco-friendly products?”

Reframe it: “What’s the last personal care product you bought, and what influenced your choice?”

📍 In Indian contexts, social desirability can play out differently across regions and languages. Moderators should watch for body language cues that suggest discomfort and probe gently.

‍

8. Leading by example

Avoid influencing participants by giving examples that could affect their responses. Especially in stakeholder-facing interviews, it might be tempting to ‘prime’ participants just to please internal teams. But doing so introduces bias and you risk missing genuine insights or signals for necessary change.

Example to avoid: "Some of our users said they like the new dark mode. What are your thoughts?" 

Reframe it: “What are your thoughts on the new design?”

Tip: When running back-to-back sessions, use templated guides with placeholder-based questions. This reduces the temptation to inject your own opinions as examples.

‍

9. Negative framing

How you frame your questions matters. Questions that focus only on “problems” give you just one side of the story and can skew your results.

Example to avoid: "What didn’t you like about the signup process?"

Reframe it: "What worked well for you, and what could be improved in the signup process?"

A balanced framing ensures your final report doesn't sound like a complaint log.

This approach supports evaluative research in product development, which focuses on assessing usability, functionality, and user satisfaction. Neutral framing helps gather balanced insights, enabling teams to make better decisions on what to improve or celebrate.

‍

10. Assumption of knowledge (jargon bias)

These questions rely on technical terms or jargon that your participants might not fully understand, leading to confusion or even inaccurate agreement. Always check that your language is clear and accessible. Don’t assume a level of expertise your participants may not have.

Example: "How often do you use split-payment UPI methods?"

Reframe it: "Can you tell me how you usually pay for things online?"
→ Let their language lead the conversation.

📚 This is crucial when conducting research in semi-urban or regional markets in India, where payment terms, app names, or UI metaphors might not be universally understood.

‍

Tailored tips for different teams :

💼 If you’re a solo researcher...
Focus on writing clean, bias-free guides so even external moderators you hire don’t inadvertently skew responses. Add notes in your guides to flag emotional or assumptive language.

🧑‍💻 If you run research in-house...
Use your session recordings to spot repeated bias patterns in your own moderating style. Over time, build your own “bias bank” of what to avoid.

Bonus: Quick self-checklist before your next interview

✅ Are your questions neutral and open-ended?
✅ Have you removed leading examples or phrasing?
✅ Are double-barreled questions broken up?
✅ Have you piloted the questions with a colleague or AI tool?
✅ Are you balancing both positives and negatives?
✅ Have you localized your language to your audience’s comfort?

Final takeaway

No matter your team’s size or research frequency, better questions lead to better insights. By avoiding these common pitfalls and adapting your questions for your particular audiences, you’ll uncover richer, more trustworthy responses that drive better business decisions.

Happy researching!

‍

FAQs

1. What are the most common mistakes in framing research questions?

Leading questions, assumptive questions, and negative framing are some of the biggest mistakes to avoid.

2. How can I avoid bias in user research questions?

Use neutral language, avoid making assumptions, and frame questions to encourage open-ended responses.

3. Why should I avoid yes/no questions in research?

Binary questions limit insights; open-ended questions provide richer data and a better understanding of user behavior.

4. What is the impact of social desirability bias in research?

It leads to skewed data as participants give responses they believe are more socially acceptable rather than their true opinions.

5. How can I ensure research participants understand my questions?

Use simple language, avoid jargon, and clarify technical terms when necessary.

‍

🔥 Have a burning research question? Talk to us.

‍